Construct · 3 fields · 6 citations

Where does dissonance collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningresolutioncompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to dissonance is resolution.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

sought physical basisdissonance3 CONSTRUCTSMusical dissonanceZARLINO · COUNTERPOINTSensory dissonanceHELMHOLTZ · ROUGHNESSCognitive dissonanceFESTINGER · CONFLICT

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Music theory

A pitch relation heard as unstable, needing resolution

In music theory, a relation between pitches sounded together or in succession that is heard as tense or unstable and conventionally calls for resolution to a consonance. Zarlino's 1558 Le istitutioni harmoniche codified how such dissonances are prepared and resolved in counterpoint, and Rameau's 1722 Traité de l'harmonie grounded consonance and dissonance in a theory of chord roots and functional harmony. The referent is a structural and aesthetic category defined within a musical grammar and its notation, not a measured perceptual roughness and not a state of mind.[1][2]

Unit
A single dissonant interval or chord in a passage, classified by its intervallic content
Recovery means
Conventionally resolved by moving the dissonant tone to a neighboring consonance
Measured by
Identified by music-theoretic analysis of intervals and voice leading against the conventions of a style

Psychoacoustics

Perceived roughness from tones whose partials beat

In psychoacoustics, the perceived roughness or unpleasantness that arises when two tones lie close enough in frequency for their partials to beat against one another within the ear's critical bandwidth. Helmholtz's 1863 Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen traced this quality to the beating of adjacent partials, and Plomp and Levelt's 1965 Tonal Consonance and Critical Bandwidth measured how the transition from consonance to dissonance tracks the critical bandwidth of the cochlea. The referent is a psychophysical quantity predicted from the acoustic spectrum and the physiology of hearing, distinct from a rule of musical grammar and from any mental discomfort over beliefs.[3][4]

Unit
A pair or complex of tones, scaled by a roughness value along their frequency separation
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Estimated from the acoustic spectrum via critical-bandwidth models and from listener roughness ratings

Social psychology

Discomfort from holding conflicting cognitions

In social psychology, the state of psychological discomfort a person feels on holding two or more cognitions that are inconsistent, which motivates efforts to reduce the inconsistency. Festinger's 1957 A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance introduced the construct, and Festinger and Carlsmith's 1959 Cognitive consequences of forced compliance demonstrated it by showing that people paid little to state a falsehood shifted their attitudes more than those paid well. The referent is a motivational state inside a person, measured through attitude change and self-report, and it has nothing to do with clashing pitches or the acoustic beating of tones.[5][6]

Unit
An episode of felt inconsistency between two or more cognitions in one person
Recovery means
Reduced by changing a cognition, adding consonant cognitions, or trivializing the conflict
Measured by
Inferred from attitude change, choice justification, and self-reported discomfort in experiments

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how dissonance sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

cognitive dissonance4 names · 5 citationsjangle · the discomfort of inconsistency, several fieldsharmony3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsbeat3 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Zarlino, G. (1558). Le istitutioni harmoniche. Venice.
  2. Rameau, J.-P. (1722). Traité de l'harmonie réduite à ses principes naturels. Paris: Jean-Baptiste-Christophe Ballard.
  3. Helmholtz, H. von. (1863). Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologische Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik. Braunschweig: Vieweg.
  4. Plomp, R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1965). Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 38(4), 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1909741
  5. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  6. Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041593

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct