Construct · 4 fields · 6 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningfactorcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to latent is factor.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
Francis Bacon, in The Elements of the Common Lawes of England (1630, composed around 1597), drew the classic line between a hidden ambiguity (Latin ambiguitas latens) and one plain on the page (ambiguitas patens): a hidden ambiguity does not show in the words themselves but appears only when they are applied to the outside facts, as when a will leaves property to 'my nephew John' and two nephews bear that name. Bacon allowed outside evidence to resolve the hidden kind, since the words alone cannot settle it, while barring such evidence for the plain kind. The referent is a concealed defect in the meaning of a legal text that surfaces against the facts, and it has nothing to do with heat stored in a change of state, an unobserved statistical quantity, or unrewarded learning in an animal.[1]
Joseph Black, whose Glasgow lectures of the 1760s were published after his death as Lectures on the Elements of Chemistry (1803), named the heat that a substance takes in or gives out while it changes state without any change in temperature, as when ice melts to water at a steady zero degrees. He called it latent, meaning hidden, because a thermometer registers nothing while the heat does its work of breaking or forming the bonds of the solid, liquid, or vapour. The referent is a quantity of thermal energy tied to a change of state, measured in energy per unit mass, and it is unrelated to a hidden flaw in a document, a factor inferred from test scores, or learning an animal does not display.[2]
Charles Spearman, in his 1904 paper 'General Intelligence,' Objectively Determined and Measured, inferred a common quantity behind a set of school and sensory test scores that no instrument measures directly, the unobserved factor he treated as general ability. Bollen's 2002 review Latent Variables in Psychology and the Social Sciences set out the modern treatment, in which a latent variable is a quantity that is not observed but is estimated from the pattern of correlations among the things that are. The referent is a hypothesised, unmeasured quantity standing behind observed indicators, and it is a different thing entirely from a concealed legal ambiguity, hidden heat in a phase change, or learning held back until reward.[3][4]
Edward Tolman and Charles Honzik, in their 1930 study Introduction and Removal of Reward, and Maze Performance in Rats, showed that rats allowed to wander an unrewarded maze learned its layout without acting on it, then ran it almost error-free as soon as food was introduced, so the learning had been present but unshown. Tolman's 1948 Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men developed this into the claim that animals build an internal map that guides behaviour only when there is reason to use it. The referent is knowledge gained without reinforcement that stays hidden in behaviour until an incentive draws it out, and it bears no relation to a hidden ambiguity in a text, heat absorbed in melting, or an unobserved statistical factor.[5][6]
Next
See how latent sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct