Construct · 4 fields · 7 citations

Where does polymorphism collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four fields Nearest construct by meaningallelecompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to polymorphism is allele.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

polymorphism4 CONSTRUCTSGenetic polymorphismFORD · POPULATION ALLELESCrystal polymorphismHALEBLIAN · CRYSTAL FORMType polymorphismCARDELLI · MANY TYPESPolyphenismWEST-EBERHARD · MORPHS

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Genetics and evolutionary biology

Multiple alleles in a population

In genetics, polymorphism is the presence of two or more distinct forms, or alleles, of a gene or trait within one interbreeding population, at frequencies too high to be explained by recurrent mutation alone. Ford's 1945 Polymorphism defined the term and separated a balanced polymorphism, held in place by selection that favours the heterozygote, from a transient one that is on its way to becoming fixed. Allison's 1954 study of the sickle-cell allele gave the classic balanced case: the allele persists because carriers resist malaria, so two forms are kept in the population by opposing pressures. At the molecular scale the same idea names a single-nucleotide polymorphism, or SNP, a site where the DNA sequence varies between individuals, as Brookes's 1999 review set out. The referent is variation among the members of a population, counted as allele frequencies, not a crystal form, a program's types, or a body plan switched on by the environment.[1][2][3]

Unit
Two or more alleles held in one population, by their frequencies
Recovery means
A balanced polymorphism is maintained across generations when selection favours the heterozygote or varies over space and time
Measured by
Counted as allele and genotype frequencies by genotyping and sequencing, then tested against what neutral drift and mutation alone would predict

Chemistry and materials

Multiple crystal forms of one solid

In chemistry and materials science, polymorphism is the ability of one solid compound to crystallise in more than one distinct arrangement of the same atoms or molecules, giving crystal forms that differ in structure while sharing a chemical formula. Graphite and diamond are the textbook illustration: both are pure carbon, yet their different lattices give sharply different hardness, colour, and conductivity. Haleblian and McCrone's 1969 Pharmaceutical Applications of Polymorphism showed why this matters for medicines, because different polymorphs of the same drug can dissolve at different rates and so change how much of it reaches the bloodstream. Datta and Grant's 2004 review surveyed how such forms are found, predicted, and controlled during drug development. The referent is a crystal packing of a fixed substance, identified by diffraction, and it has nothing to do with alleles in a population or interfaces in a program.[4][5]

Unit
Two or more crystal structures of one compound, at a fixed formula
Recovery means
A metastable polymorph can convert to a more stable form over time, so manufacturers control the conditions that fix which form crystallises
Measured by
Identified and told apart by X-ray diffraction, thermal analysis, and spectroscopy, and linked to dissolution and stability behaviour

Computer science

One interface, many types

In programming, polymorphism is the property that lets a single name or interface operate on values of more than one type, so that one piece of code works across many kinds of data. Cardelli and Wegner's 1985 On Understanding Types, Data Abstraction, and Polymorphism gave the standard map of its varieties: parametric polymorphism, where a function is written once and applies uniformly to any type, as with generics; inclusion or subtype polymorphism, where a value of a subtype is accepted wherever its supertype is expected, as in object inheritance; and ad-hoc polymorphism, such as overloading, where one name selects different code for different argument types. The common point is one interface standing in for many underlying types. The referent is a discipline of typed programs, checked by a compiler or dispatched at run time, and it does not name a variant in DNA, a crystal structure, or an insect caste.[6]

Unit
One interface resolved to many underlying types
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Established by a type system and checked at compile time, or resolved by dispatch at run time

Developmental biology

the capacity of a single genotype to develop into two or more discrete body forms set by the environment.

In developmental biology, polymorphism, and especially the special case called polyphenism, names the capacity of a single genotype to develop into two or more discrete, alternative body forms, with the form an individual takes set by its environment rather than by which alleles it carries. The queen and worker castes of a bee colony, or the seasonal wing patterns of some butterflies, share their genes but develop down separate switch-controlled paths. West-Eberhard's 1989 review placed such developmental switches at the centre of how new forms arise, since a plastic response can later become fixed. This is a different meaning from the genetic one: there the forms track different alleles spread across a population, while here one genome yields many forms in response to cues. The referent is an organism's developmental outcome, and it shares only the word with crystal forms and program types.[7]

Unit
Two or more discrete forms produced from one genome
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed by rearing one genotype under different conditions and scoring the discrete forms that result

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how polymorphism sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

mutation4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsselection4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsphase5 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, five constructs

References

  1. Ford, E. B. (1945). Polymorphism. Biological Reviews, 20(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1945.tb00315.x
  2. Allison, A. C. (1954). Protection afforded by sickle-cell trait against subtertian malarial infection. British Medical Journal, 1(4857), 290–294. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4857.290
  3. Brookes, A. J. (1999). The essence of SNPs. Gene, 234(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00219-X
  4. Haleblian, J., & McCrone, W. (1969). Pharmaceutical applications of polymorphism. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 58(8), 911–929. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600580802
  5. Datta, S., & Grant, D. J. W. (2004). Crystal structures of drugs: Advances in determination, prediction and engineering. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 3(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1280
  6. Cardelli, L., & Wegner, P. (1985). On understanding types, data abstraction, and polymorphism. ACM Computing Surveys, 17(4), 471–523. https://doi.org/10.1145/6041.6042
  7. West-Eberhard, M. J. (1989). Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 249–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001341

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct