Construct · 4 fields · 5 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningadjunctcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to complement is adjunct.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In set theory the complement of a set A is the collection of all elements not in A: the absolute complement is taken with respect to a fixed universe, while the relative complement B minus A keeps only the elements of B that lie outside A. The operation obeys a definite algebra, including the De Morgan laws that swap union with intersection under complementation, and taking the complement twice returns the original set. Halmos's Naive Set Theory develops the operation and its identities from the axioms. The referent is a purely formal object, a subset of a universe, with no cascade, no clause, and no market behind it.[1]
The complement system is a cascade of blood plasma proteins in innate immunity: activation through the classical, lectin, or alternative pathways triggers a sequence of cleavages that opsonise pathogens for phagocytosis, release fragments that recruit inflammatory cells, and assemble the membrane attack complex that punctures target membranes. Ricklin, Hajishengallis, Yang, and Lambris's 2010 review Complement: a key system for immune surveillance and homeostasis set out its pathways, effector functions, and regulation. The referent is a biochemical defence network in the body, measured by protein levels and lytic activity, and it is unrelated to a subset of a universe, a syntactic constituent, or a pair of goods.[2][3]
In syntax a complement is a constituent that a head requires to complete its meaning, such as the object of a verb, the noun phrase after a preposition, or a clause selected by an adjective or verb: She relied on him and I know that it rained contain prepositional and clausal complements. Complements are licensed and selected by their head, which distinguishes them from adjuncts, the optional modifiers a phrase can shed without becoming ungrammatical. Huddleston and Pullum's The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language draws the complement versus adjunct distinction in detail. The referent is a grammatical relation within a sentence, not a plasma protein, a subset, or a good bought alongside another.[4]
In economics two goods are complements when they are consumed jointly, so a fall in the price of one raises demand for the other: cars and fuel, or printers and cartridges, move together, and the relationship is captured by a negative cross-price elasticity of demand. Hicks and Allen's 1934 A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value gave the modern formal treatment of substitutes and complements within the ordinal theory of demand. The referent is a relationship between goods in a market, quantified by how one good's price shifts another's quantity, and it has nothing to do with a protein cascade, a syntactic slot, or a subset of a universe.[5]
Next
See how complement sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct